By Martin McLaughlin
Representatives of the ruling parties of Serbia and Montenegro met in
Belgrade Wednesday, in the first official talks in more than a year
between the two regimes which comprise the Federal Republic of
The meeting was demanded by Montenegrin President Milo Djukanovic
to begin a drastic restructuring of the federal state, or set the stage for
secession by Montenegro, the last of the republics of the former
Yugoslavia still associated with Serbia.
Among the concessions sought by Djukanovic are Belgrade's agreement
to Montenegrin control of Yugoslav Army units in Montenegro, as well
as a separate and internationally convertible currency and other measures
which will effectively separate the Montenegrin economy from that of
Serbia. If Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic rejects these
proposals, as is expected, Montenegrin officials have threatened to hold
a referendum on secession some time in the fall.
The pressure for independence for Montenegro comes not so much from
the province's population, which is overwhelmingly Serbian, as from the
United States and its European NATO allies, who see separation of
Montenegro from Serbia as another, and potentially fatal, blow against
the Milosevic regime.
Secession of Montenegro would deprive Serbia of its sole outlet to the
Adriatic Sea. The bulk of Serbia's prewar oil supplies came by tanker
through Montenegro. Without the small republic—its population is only
615,000 compared to Serbia's 10 million—Serbia is landlocked, and
surrounded by neighboring states which are either openly hostile
(Croatia, Bosnia and Albania), members of NATO (Hungary), occupied
by NATO (Kosovo and Macedonia) or candidates to join NATO
(Romania and Bulgaria).
It is for precisely this reason that the United States has sought to foment
movement for the independence of Montenegro for the last few years, at
least since the election of Djukanovic in 1997 over a candidate backed
by Milosevic. Washington sees Montenegro as the last link in the chain
required to complete the economic blockade imposed on Belgrade
during the Bosnian civil war and maintained in one form or another ever
Djukanovic has moved more and more openly into the role of an
American puppet. He tacitly sided with NATO during the Kosovo war,
although he was careful to avoid direct conflict with the 40,000 Yugoslav
Army troops stationed in Montenegro. NATO warplanes carried out few
air strikes within the republic, leaving it relatively undamaged compared
On May 26, with the bombing at its peak, the Montenegrin government
called for all Yugoslav Army troops in the republic to be withdrawn or
turned over to its control, a demand summarily rejected by the army
commanders. But as most army reservists have been demobilized and
sent home after Belgrade's surrender to the NATO bombing campaign,
the total number of federal troops in Montenegro has declined to
15,000—far fewer than the enormous NATO force being built up just to
the south in Kosovo.
US President Bill Clinton has invited Djukanovic to a summit of
European leaders to be held July 28 in Sarajevo, to discuss
reconstruction in Bosnia and elsewhere in the Balkans. Serb and
Yugoslav federal officials are barred from this meeting.
The only external factor which could retard a breakaway by Montenegro
is the intensifying rivalry between the United States and Germany over
control of the various fragments of the former Yugoslavia. The economic
platform being drafted by the Djukanovic government would create, not
an independent Montenegro, but an economic colony of Germany.
According to Veselin Vukotic, an economics professor at the University
of Montenegro who worked on the platform and discussed it with the
British business newspaper the Financial Times, the plan is to establish
a new currency, a convertible dinar, backed by a currency board—an
entity which would be controlled by international lenders, not the
Montenegrin government, to ensure currency stability. A subsidy of 400
million deutsche marks would be provided to keep the dinar at
one-to-one parity with the German currency.
Other parts of the plan, the Financial Times said, include “accelerated
privatization, deregulation, protection of private property rights, equal
treatment for foreign investors, and the establishment of a foreign trade
regime open to world markets.”
Prime Minister Filip Vujanovic said the economic program would be
adopted by his government by the end of July and then forwarded to
Belgrade for ratification. If Milosevic vetoes the plan, this will provide an
additional pretext for the plebiscite on secession from Yugoslavia.
The preparation of American public opinion for the next stage in the
US-sponsored dismemberment of Yugoslavia is well under way. Most
significant in this regard is the article by Christopher Hedges published
July 10 on the front page of the New York Times.
Hedges describes military preparations by Montenegrin officials for a
confrontation with the Yugoslav Army. He quotes a number of violently
anti-Serb statements from representatives of Montenegrin nationalism, to
give the impression that the province is seething with hatred of Serbs and
the desire to break with them.
What is concealed in this distortion of reality is the simple fact that
Montenegrins are Serbs, speaking the same language and sharing the
same cultural, religious and historical traditions. While there is undoubted
popular hostility to the Milosevic regime in Montenegro, that is true in
Serbia as well. It is the intervention of the imperialist powers, and
especially the United States, which seeks to turn this popular anger in the
direction of secession.
To say that Montenegro is not viable as an independent country is an
understatement. It has about the same area as Kosovo, but only one third
the population, and much less fertile land and industrial development. The
province's name—it means literally “Black Mountain”—describes it well.
In seeking to use Montenegro to cut off Serbia from access to the sea,
the Clinton administration is following in well-worn historical footsteps.
This was the policy pursued throughout the nineteenth century by the
Habsburg Empire, the Ottoman Empire, and the Germany of Prince
Bismarck. The Habsburgs were particularly fearful that independent
Serbia would become a magnet for oppressed south Slav peoples, and
insisted on maintaining an independent Montenegro and later erecting an
independent Albania to keep Serbia landlocked, small and weak.
The example of Montenegro demonstrates the real thrust of imperialist
policy in the Balkans. Far from being concerned with preventing ethnic
cleansing or crimes against humanity, the US and NATO have overseen
a process in which the former multiethnic Yugoslavia has been converted,
piece by piece, into a series of weak, ethnically homogeneous statelets,
each of them completely dependent on the imperialist powers both
economically and politically.